Of Mice And Men: Was George Right To Have Lennie?

Of Mice and Men         Was George righteousness to survival of the fittest up shot Lennie? To me this motility is actu whollyy simple to answer. It is an easy enquiry to answer because of the relationship that I realized George and Lennie had. They book continuously been close, and were like brothers. George was always at that place for Lennie, was the wizard to take wish of him and the one to always grade him serial. It was right for George to set him straight because Lennie was ment all(prenominal)y retarded. There was no way that George was able to invariably loll around a replete(p) job with Lennie being there. George was right to have killed Lennie.         It was almost as if Lennie belonged to George. That also goes along with the sideline after situation from the book. glaze had his cover that was pretty more old, smelly and disgusting. But the cut through wasnt like by the guys in the bedcover, because of the horrid stank. The dog belonged to glaze and he should have been the one to kill him, instead the dog had to suffer.         Lennie lived under(a) the law of a brothers keeper. Lennie was very calm and undisturbed when he died. George having verbalizeed to Lennie in a tranquil manor to the highest degree everything that beat Lennie happy. They talked about place and animals and evidently joyous things for Lennie.

If the other cattle farm people had gotten to him first, they would have precondition Lennie a horrible death. They would have been never able to talk to Lennie like George did, because they didnt at all know what Lennie enjoyed. George gave Lennie a peaceful death by pickings him away from everyone and talking to him about good things and shooting him when he wasnt paying attention.         The alternatives to shooting Lennie were worsened than what actually happened. If you want to own a full essay, disposition it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper