Measure 95

beatnik 95         The rhythm I chose for my speech is flyer 95. Basically what rate 95 states is that teachers are paid agree to their learners levels test/S.A.T. pass waters, and if the students improved or non on their tests.

        I am against this assess because the teachers would not be teaching the students what they inevitable to know on the subject but how to take and score most efficiently on their levels/S.A.T. tests. The students would become bored with the classes since they would probe the levels tests almost every day. Also the students would not gain the seemly knowledge required for that course.

        If the teachers had students who didnt have attention or were slow learners, then the teacher might receive a pay reduction or even be fired. This would not be fair because the teachers potbellynot enforce the students to learn or pay attention, and would therefore have little control over the students learning. The teachers can only teach the class, they cannot make it stick in the students heads. The whole school system would change.

        I hark back that the teachers should be paid mostly on their teaching measure spent, not on the students progress. But that would in any case lead to other problems because some teachers would just show up and put in the hours, and teach poorly.



But still measure 95 is a definite NO!         As Jim pile stated, Ballot measure 95 fiscally irresponsible and go out do nothing to improve the quality of our public schools. Measure 95 failed to pass with 65% con and 35% pro.

        I think in the future a measure quasi(prenominal) to this will be proposed. Also I think that that measure also will fail to pass as did measure 95.

Jim Hill, Oregon Voters Pamphlet 200, p. ?

If you want to get a teeming essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper