Writing tips and writing guidelines for students. Case study samples, admission essay examples, book reviews, paper writing tips, college essays, research proposal samples.
Sunday, May 26, 2019
Impact of Education on Society Essay
term capitalism is prevailing in the modern monastic order, the electric come onlet on whether an amoral profit driven capitalist body is inviolable for the society or not has been raised. Some believe that an amoral capitalist system is the best way of life to organize individuals together to serve the society. However, otherwises argue that a amoral capitalist system pass on harm the society instead of bring in it. In this essay, I allow for be presenting the go through of two neoclassical economists, Ricky wire-haired pointing griffon and Adam Smith, who support the idea on the amoral capitalism is good for the society. I will in any case controvert the opposing view presented by Arthur milling appliance that suggests a profit drive, amoral capitalist system will do harm to a society . Furthermore, I am going to compare and contrast the two view and concluded with Millers view Capitalism encourages wrinkle custody to set up profitable amoral decisions will not benefit our society.While Griffin, Smith and Miller are dimension two significantly different views, they both agree on capitalism is an amoral system. consort to Griffin, profit is the only incentive for any pipeline to operate on a lower floor a capitalist system. Smith, father of capitalism, shows his understanding of amoral capitalism by saying, We address our self, not to their humanity but to their self-love, and never talk to them of our involve got necessities but to their advantages. (Smith 119) This quote clearly illustrates that people would act forth of their own interest instead of considering others under capitalism. Further, Miller compare this amoral capitalism with uncivilized animals when the character, Christ, says This is a land of gr wipe out big dogs, you enters love a man here, out eat him the world is that wayThis is a zoo, a zoo (Miller p81) Although with a negative feeling and view, Miller believes capitalism is amoral just as much as Griffin and S mith do. Moreover, Miller suggests capitalism can force people to make amoral, profitable decision because capitalist system is an amoral profit driven system. Smith bet to a agree on Millers view on some degree.Many capitalists assert the profitable decisions are high-octane, and faculty will benefit society. Adam Smith claims that a societys interests are best served by private enterpriseallowing individual within that society to pursue their own interests (Griffin p21) In the business context, pursue their own interest is best describe as increase the meshwork of their own companies. Griffin and Smith believe that advance business to maximizing profit will benefit society in two ways. First of all, business will try their best to produce larger amount of goods and service for net profit because profits are a very strong incentive to individuals within a materialistic society.Furthermore, due to the fact that both business is trying to maximizing profits, arguing will ari se amongst the businesses. In order for businesses to success, business men have to make very efficient decisions and outperform others. Therefore, by being an strong incentive and creating competition amount and businesses, maximizing profit friend to society achieve a greater efficiency and create sufficient goods and service. And both Griffin and Smith imply that an amoral, self-interest, profit driven system is the salient support for individual to make profits maximizing decision.Miller, on the other hand, disagree with Smith and Griffin. Miller argues that encourage business men to make only profitable decisions will not serve our society, because what is good for the business is not equal to what is good for the society. In Millers play, he expresses his opinion by using a central conflicts that is created by Joe Keller ships out hundreds and twenty cracked cylinder heads to sustain his business, but also results the death of twenty one pilots. Miller uses his play to demo nstrate a profitable decision, ships out cracked cylinder heads, is not consist with the social interest of helping the soldiers and winning the war.What is even worse is that Joe Keller is been force into this immoral decision due to the competition and the demand of efficiency. Miller point out that amoral capitalist system is not just encourages business to make amoral decision, but forcing them to make immoral decision for their business. Miller implies that when Joe says, Im in business, a man in business a hundreds and twenty cracked, youre out of business you got a process, the process dont work youre out of businessyou stuff is no good them close you up, they tear up your contrast, what the hells it to them?(Miller p69) This also shows capitalism is a cold-blood, insensible system because nothing also matters in capitalism besides business, profit and individual themselves.Further, Miller also suggests efficiency is not forever good for the societywhen Joe Keller says It is a madhouse. Every half hour the Major calling for cylinder heads, they whippinsic us with the telephone. The trucks were hauling them away hot, damn near. I average just try to encounter it human, see it human. All the sudden a batch comes out with a crack. That happens, thats the business, a fine hair farm animal crack. (Miller p32) Kellers line evidently demonstrates the cracked cylinder heads are resulted from efficient using of machines to tackle the demand. Miller suggests that focusing on efficiency may lead to poor fibre or in some case the immoral, cracked products.Nowadays, China is facing the similar problems that is described by Miller, the 2008 China milk scandal is a ameliorate example. The China milk scandal is causing by the high demand of the infant milk quantity and high concentration of potent. In order to meet those demand, the companies have to adulterate the milk with poisoned chemical, melamine, to produce milk in a greater quantity as well up as the hig h potent concentration. However, this performance resulted over 300,000 infants kidneys damaged. Therefore, with strong real life, blooded proofs, focusing on a achieving efficiency does not always benefit society.Another important argument holding by Smith and Griffin is the economy exploitation which is resulting from the profitable decision of all businesses. Griffin also point out amoral profitable decision would help economy to be stabilized and decrease the unemployment. As Griffin describes, (Economy growth), increases in the amount of goods and service produced by our own resource. In theory, we all want our system too expandmore business, more jobs, more wealth for everyone (Griffin p27) Griffin not only believes that economy growth will benefit the society, but also suggests that economy growth is what everyone wanted.Furthermore, Griffin introduces some more measurement of economy and standard of living. Griffin implies the GDP and GNP would measure the amount products and service that is recyclable for people indicated standard of living for people in the society. He also strongly implicitly suggest the GDP per capital is salient indicator that shows the well being of the individual within the system. In a conclusion, Smith and Griffin claim that is a capitalist system will lead to economy growth and would bring wealth and improve standard of living for everyone.However, Miller argues that economy growth does not benefit the whole society. Miller also implies that maximizing profits for business does not improve the peoples quality of life, instead it increase the inequality amount people. Miller illustrate that by presenting Joe Kellers troubling after(prenominal) Joe Keller has achieved his business success. Joe is a materially rich man. However, when George, Joes partners son, come to visit Joe, Joe becomes worried as his wife Kate explains, He is worried. When he is worried we goes to sleep (Miller p41)Furthermore, Joes economic success ma les him even more misery when his only son, Chris, turns against Joe and Joes amoral business.Miller makes it very clear that even to a business man, making profits and economy growth do not bring him happiness. In addition, Miller exhibits that economy growth, making profits and business success may imagines much less important for a non-business man, such as Chris. Chris burst out, What the hell do you think I was thinking of, the Goddamsic business? Is that as far as your mind can see, the business? What is that, the world-the business? Dont you have a country? Dont you stay in the world?(Miller p70) Miller also implies that is wrong for Smith and Griffin considering maximizing profits as self-interests for all business men.Miller believes capitalism forces men to make immoral decision will create conflicts between businessmen and the others or even between businessmen and themselves. Miller demonstrates the conflict between the business man, Joe, and his neighbors when Sue exp lains, Who is he to ruin a mans life? Everybody knows Joe pulled a fast one to get out of jail. (Miller p45) Furthermore, Miller presents the conflict between Joe and Chris by having Chris criticizes, Youre not even an animal, not animal kills his own, what are you? (Miller p70) Miller suggests that amoral decision making create this conflict between Chris and Joe because Chris is criticizing Joes ethical motive and his amoral decision that Joe did not wish to make. This self conflict that Joe has is shown when Joe explains, I didnt want it that way(the immoral way), either (Miller p76) Miller implies capitalism would not bring happiness and happiness to society, but bring the conflicts.Nowadays, as the debate on amoral capitalism is heating up. More and morepeople tend to agree Millers view in various degree, and believe that a business needs to have some moral province other then profit making. While many believe that corporate social responsibility, also known as CSR, is a dece nt solution to help amoral capitalism to become moral. an article named responsibility is good for the business published by the Washington Post suggests that businesses which carry on social responsibilities would more likely to earn a greater profits and do better in stock market. The author Christopher Flavelle also presents many statistics and data to support his argument on CSR will help both society and the business. And he writes, a number of CSR fund managers insist that responsible behavior helps companies performance and that a significant differential becomes visible over time. (Flavelle p2) as to take to heart that business will also benefit from CSR.Another author Jason Magder from The new internationalists believes that more information of all corporation become public, business will have to become more and more ethical. However, Magder seem to believe capitalism will not stand for that to happen when he says, Capitalism worked because people couldnt see into the kitc hen (Magder p1) I argue that business sense would always valued over the moral sense under a capitalist system. Flavelle also implies the same view when he says, If they see CSR as contributing to their bottom line, theyll continue to act responsibly. If they see CSR as a kind of a PR campaign, theyll probably flash back back on it(Flavelle p1) However, Flavelle believe that is not matter because capitalists can make moral decision and also get reward.So many years after Miller and Smith, this issue on amoral capitalism is still being debating. I believe capitalism forces business men to make profitable amoral decisions may not benefit our society at all. However, maybe Smith is also correct on capitalism is the best way to serve the society before other solutions appear. And with many evidences from different countries, I have to agree with Griffin and Smith that capitalism is efficient. However, I would only describe capitalism as an insensitive, bloody, efficiently machine that does not have feel and moral.The core of capitalism is still profit driven, materialistic, and money. money money money money, when you said it long enough it doesnt mean anything.(Miller p73) How important is efficiency and profits, when it does not bring joy andhappiness to our society. How can we be well off without compassion, moral value, sympathy and all that feeling that make us as human being.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment