Both Kantianism and Act Utilitarianism attempt to define our creation of morality and the vastness of individual dos. One important aspect of both ideals in philosophy is that of equality. In terms of ethics, in practice and in study, philosophers seek to understand what governs a persons decisions and what motivates them to make those decisions. Ultimately, any act has a positive or negative reaction. This is a saucer-eyed scientific fact, yet it stern be applied to any matchless at any place or time. Given this theory, any action a person makes testament (directly or indirectly) affect everyone else. This begs the interview: How should a person act, and how will it affect not all their life, but the life of everyone else (through the repercussions of their original action). Many philosophers preach almost the pursuit of happiness, because lets face it, everyone extremitys to be happy. But, in this simple want or need, lies a conflict of desires. With the millions of people on this earth, how can one person expect to act in a beneficial manner for both themselves and the world around them? Everyone is different. It is a basic fact of life, something that we learn at an early age. in that location are different levels of poverty, well-being, etc.
The only way that people will truly act beneficially to themselves and others is through equality. No one is truly satisfied unless situations are fair, just and equal. If one theme (or even one person) has more power, money, or opportunities, it is natural to mint that the less fortunate would feel unequal, and eventually would act upon their unrest. So, for everyone to be truly happy, everything would have to be equal. There would be no greed, since everyone would have the same amount of money, and assumedly...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment