Without knowing first what artifice is, we will not be able to tell what life-threatening is art. Having studied several distinct definitions of art, I am most satisfied with Tolstoys definition of art from his act What is Art? (pckt pg.21). According to Tolstoy, art is a descriptor of communication, a vehicle which the artist place use to reveal his feelings and emotion; it is a means of intercourse between small-arm and man (pckt pg. 23). Tolstoys definition of art is hardly based on the beauty of the figure out, rather he focuses on the communicative qualities of the work namely, infectiousness, clarity and sincerity. Thus, any piece of work displaying all the triad conditions in any varying stagecoach, is considered a work of art. The character of a work of art is determined by the degree to which it is sincere, clear and infectious. Using Tolstoys given definition of art my essay attempts to discuss what art is practiced for, mainly with respect to ethics.
My deadlock on art is that it can be some(prenominal) for good and for bad when it comes to the question of ethics. For example, literary works as art can act in both ways, which way it goes depends on both the writer and reader.
Literature, since its inception has ceaselessly been a form of communication, and good literature be it the prose of Trollope, poems of Blake, the plays of Shakespe are or even political propaganda has endlessly had the sincerity of its creator. Throughout history, literature has been able to bring a social, or moral message to the people. And good literature has always been infectious, at times even igniting reform and revolution. Without a doubt, literature brings to the reader or audience a circumstance we are unable to experience in real life and thus...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment