'English Language Article Comparison Essay\r'

'In this piece of deed I leave be comp be twain denominations from newspapers. Both the members be close the homogeneous figment and were printed on the like day (Tuesday October 13th 1998), however they atomic number 18 from two different newspapers. One of them is from The cheer and the other from The wire, the master(prenominal) difference amid these two papers is that The lie is a tabloid and The telegraph is a broadsheet. through proscribed this piece of work I volition try to examine the difference in their attitudes towards writing news due to this mutation in category of newspaper.\r\nThe article concerns hound franks that were at a jurisprudence dog teaching unit, the instructor every(prenominal)egedly forced a handler to drop by the courseside and hang the dogs, one of the dogs problematic died. The first and more or less characteristic topic you realise to a greater extent(prenominal) or less these two stories is the difference in advert izes. Firstly in The wire the height of the earn involved is further approximately 1cm where as in The insolate it is 2. 6cm. This clearly shows that The cheerfulness wants to shed a larger impact and ingest your attention to that circumstance explanation.\r\nOther points some the headlines that back this up argon the genius of writing. In The Telegraph the headline has been compose in seriph, this doer that the editor has intractable to use a font which involves itsy-bitsy decorative lines at the ends of letters, however The Sun’s headline is in sans serif and so doesn’t put on these lines. This learns the letters practic eachy to a greater extent sharp, and ‘right-angled’ this earns a hard impression to the paroles and helps suck in proofreaders.\r\nAnother way the editor has employ the headline to attract the reader in The Sun is by using stay capitals, this instantly makes the letters bigger, footstall out and coupled with th e words being in bold black and sans serif gives a real shock effect. A semblance in the midst of these two headlines though is that they both use retells, this makes it sound and feel more real to a reader because it decl bes on the nose what actual people said and later having read the subheadline, probably what they said in move. However, I in person feel that the main difference is the actual words that demand been use.\r\nThe Sun’s headline is lots more emotive, it uses words such as ‘ barbaric’, ‘kick’ and devastation. These words leave instantly capture people and leaven up images that will stir their imaging and make them want to read on. not but this but the headline excessively reads ‘kick his own dog to cobblers last’, this makes it seem raze worse because it wasn’t a dog belonging to the police but his own family court. It makes the integral thing seem even more cruel and will once again make people m ore interested in the story, especially for people who bring pet dogs.\r\nHowever, The Telegraph is overmuch more instructive and factual, it makes a statement slightly what happened without departure into gunpoint about the emotions of it. It says; ‘Police ‘told to kick and punch dogs”, although it does uses words such as ‘kick’ and ‘punch’ it uses them in a way to inform what the police had been told to do and doesn’t go into detail about what the trainer was the likes of. I likewise feel an enkindle thing to also look at is the use of ‘made’ and ‘told’ in these two headlines.\r\nWhen The Sun says ‘…made turn back kick his own god to death’ it uses ‘made’ to incriminate the trainers, it makes it sound like the policemen didn’t have a excerption and that the whole incident was the trainers fault. Whereas The Telegraph uses ‘told’, this is much more informative and is simply precept what happened, there is no emotional cast in the way The Telegraph have written this headline. The subheadlines be also kinda evoke, firstly their placing, The Telegraph has indomitable to step up the subheadline out front the main headline and in The Sun it has been placed by and by the headline. This whitethorn have been done for a yield of reasons.\r\nIn The Telegraph the subheadline reads; ‘German Shepard died after punishment, court told’ this subheadline has probably been use to give the reader a bit more information about the story forwards they read on like the eccentric of dog involved and the fact that the dog died. In The Sun they have fixed to put the information that the dog died in their headline and the fact it was a German Shepard isn’t mentioned in The Sun at all. On to The Sun’s subheadline and it simply reads ‘Jury told of punishment’ this has been put after the headline to inform the reader of where the quote of the headline came from.\r\nAs well as this in The Sun not only does it have a subheadline after the headline, it also has other subheadlines throughout the story to set off new parts of the article and to fragmentise it into three parts; the extra subheadlines be ‘Warned’ and ‘Shaking’. These words are in reality apply in the section of the article they introduce so that the reader will want to continue. You notice these words and they stand out because they are very communicatory and they give you information about what is spill to happen in the article even if you don’t read on.\r\nI also feel that The Sun has utilise these particular words to good use, if you didn’t have time to read the whole article and only read the headline and these subheadlines you would leave with a very smashed feeling of hatred towards the trainers. Not only with words like ‘made’ which I have already explained, but when it is followed by a subheadline of ‘warned’ it makes you feel as though the police were threatened by the trainers and were warned by them to do nothing wrong. I personally feel that The Telegraph has a more trenchant headline for a particular reason.\r\nThe Sun has made it’s main headline strike out of the paginate and really make you read on, this means they have put a straightforward subheadline so as not to shadow the headline. Whereas The Telegraph has done it the other way around, their headline is not so hard- impinging so the editor has decided to include an emotive subheadline to aid the reader in being interested in the story and to red on. After having seen the headlines and been attracted to the story you embark on to read the main text.\r\nStraight absent in the hook paragraph you move see differences in the papers’ attitudes. Firstly, and most obviously the fact that in The Sun the first paragraph has been written i n bold, and simply written normally in The Telegraph. Once again it seems that The Sun has been much more emotive in its approach. terminology such as ‘forced’ and ‘kicked it’ are used, not only this but the word ‘DIED’ is written in block capitals, this is to punctuate the word and everything it means and the horror of what happened to the dogs. rowing used in The Telegraph are very interesting.\r\nThe first line explains that the dogs were ‘chastised’, it is interesting they should use this word because although it is hard hitting it probably doesn’t have the selfsame(prenominal) effect on you as ‘ kick’ (which is in The Sun). However The Telegraph does say that dogs were ‘hung helplessly from a wall by their leads’ this is then followed by ‘a court was told yesterday’ it is as though The Telegraph wants to remain on the fence by simply stating what was said but at the same time dr umming up emotion in the reader and qualification them read on, all in all The Sun is more opinionated and The Telegraph is trying as best it tush to stay factual.\r\nA similarity amongst the two stories is the use of quotation. Both articles have many quotes from the police officers and trainers in read/write head and almost all of the quotes were said in court. This could well be because on the day these two articles were published the case was take over in court and they had little else to go on than this. Also the writer of the article in The Sun has done something meagrely unusual in that he has decided to put some paragraphs into italics. This is almost surely to draw the readers attention to that part of the story and make them read and think about it a different way.\r\nThere are three paragraphs throughout the article that are in italics and out of these two of them point on the cruelty to the animals, they go into detail about the way in which this happened and how the dogs reacted to it. The tertiary paragraph describes how two of the handlers left in protest to what was going on before the dog died. Both these points are sooner signifi rout outt to the overall story and you can see why the writer may well have wanted the reader to be more aware of these facts that perchance other points. Another point that I have found very interesting is sentence type used in both articles.\r\nIt is normal for newspapers to use a lot of declarative sentences, these help the newsperson to get across to the reader all the important information quickly and easily. An causa from The Sun would be; ‘PC crowd together English told the court his dog Tazz had been hanged for growl’ and The Telegraph; ‘Trainers at the police dog unit, based at Sandon, Chelmsford, Essex’. However, differences occur between the newspapers when you look at the use of mazy sentences, these are more rarely used in papers as they are longer and are not so dramatic.\r\nHowever, as you would except it is The Telegraph that has used a couple but The Sun has used a lot fewer. As I have already described, The Telegraph is a more up-market paper and is aimed towards a sector of society who appreciate this form of writing whereas The Sun is not. In fact a complex sentence has been used in The Telegraph to say the same as my last quotation of a declarative sentence from The Sun; ”PC James English said his dog, Tazz was double subjected to the hanging method after he had growled during training’.\r\n'