Postmodernism and the Fundamentalist Revival Essay -- Postmodernism

Postmodernism and the Fundamentalist Revival For contemporary Western in particular Ameri kindlethought, thither have been two prevailing theories, at gelid ends of the spectrum. There is the tenet that thither are absolute ethical forces, and on that point is the belief that there are no set standards of judgment. Both of these views look extreme, attacking our spirit of modernity and our sense of personal values. Consequently, to the highest degree the great unwashed find their infinite somewhere moderately amidst the two. As in the midst of belief and doubt there is agnosticism, or between moralism and immoralism there is amoralism, between the belief in standards and the belief in no standards there is postmodernism. Postmodernism places at its core that there is no unified theory or prey standard by which to judge every thing that is and that there can be no independent standard for determining which of many have-to doe with interpretations is the right 1 (Fish). Postmodernists thus assign the label opinion to most qualitative concepts a belief in an afterlife, bagels, and international politics cannot be judged on the akin scale. This is very egalitarian, allowing people to have personal beliefs firearm not ineluctably bothering others with them. Even in light of the fundamentalist hustle that crashed after the terrorist attacks of family line 11, 2001, postmodernism, the central ism of contemporary America, has withstood the test of time. As a melodic line of thinking, postmodernism has had an easy existence in the latter fractional of the 20th century. by and by World War II, the only conflicts we have had both involved blanched politics (the Watergate scandal), isolated events (the Cuban missile crisis), or ideological disputes (Korean and Vietnam... ...st theories, was besotted enough (or possibly flimsy enough) to withstand a new fundamentalist revival. The belief in polar rights and wrongs is stronger now, after the attacks, nevertheless postmodernisms invulnerability does not mean that it is incorruptible to these polar beliefs. A new philosophy that incorporates both of these ideas may soon emerge, seeking to assuage opponents of each, and, even if it succeeds, such a ideological fusion would be natural in postmodernism, in the belief that this idea of standards and measurements cannot be completely disproven.Sources CitedFish, Stanley. criticism Without Absolutes. New York Times. A19. 15 Oct. 2001Halliday, Fred. Two Hours that Shook the World. London Saqi Books, 2002Rothstein, Edward. Attacks on U.S. altercate the Perspectives of Postmodern adjust Believers. New York Times. A17. 22 Sep. 2001. Postmodernism and the Fundamentalist Revival try on -- PostmodernismPostmodernism and the Fundamentalist Revival For contemporary Westernparticularly Americanthought, there have been two prevailing theories, at polar ends of the spectrum. There is the belief that there are absolu te ethical forces, and there is the belief that there are no set standards of judgment. Both of these views seem extreme, attacking our sense of modernity and our sense of personal values. Consequently, most people find their place somewhere moderately between the two. As between belief and unbelief there is agnosticism, or between moralism and immoralism there is amoralism, between the belief in standards and the belief in no standards there is postmodernism. Postmodernism places at its core that there is no unified theory or objective standard by which to judge every thing that is and that there can be no independent standard for determining which of many rival interpretations is the right one (Fish). Postmodernists thus assign the label opinion to most qualitative concepts a belief in an afterlife, bagels, and international politics cannot be judged on the same scale. This is very egalitarian, allowing people to have personal beliefs while not necessarily bothering others with t hem. Even in light of the fundamentalist wave that crashed after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, postmodernism, the central philosophy of contemporary America, has withstood the test of time. As a form of thinking, postmodernism has had an easy existence in the latter half of the 20th century. After World War II, the only conflicts we have had either involved bloodless politics (the Watergate scandal), isolated events (the Cuban missile crisis), or ideological disputes (Korean and Vietnam... ...st theories, was strong enough (or possibly flimsy enough) to withstand a new fundamentalist revival. The belief in polar rights and wrongs is stronger now, after the attacks, but postmodernisms invulnerability does not mean that it is incorruptible to these polar beliefs. A new philosophy that incorporates both of these ideas may soon emerge, seeking to pacify opponents of each, and, even if it succeeds, such a ideological fusion would be born in postmodernism, in the bel ief that this idea of standards and measurements cannot be completely disproven.Sources CitedFish, Stanley. Condemnation Without Absolutes. New York Times. A19. 15 Oct. 2001Halliday, Fred. Two Hours that Shook the World. London Saqi Books, 2002Rothstein, Edward. Attacks on U.S. Challenge the Perspectives of Postmodern True Believers. New York Times. A17. 22 Sep. 2001.