Rousseau, Hobbes, and Locke : Interpretations of Human Nature Essay

Through time people support always wondered what it is that makes us who we are. It has been our merciful temperament that has kept us intrigued with ourselves, and our relationships with others. With this curio came various interpretations as to our human genius, each changing the way we hold the societal world we live in. With each interpretation came a infixed understanding of people and the relationship they hold with each other. Human constitution has been one of the most studied elements of the world we live in. From our personality came the take of how we as humans interact with each other, through with(predicate) the development of our nature some pretend served and others had ruled. Three philosophers that have focused their political ideas more or less human nature have abandoned a deeper meaning to their get of politics through the understanding of human nature. Each one of them had a distinctive interpretation of what human nature was and how it imp acted the politics of the specific society that they envisioned. It is hard to say that one of them holds the answers to the true essence of human nature but one can say that each of them has given an interesting and strong piece of the puzzle that has linked human nature to politics. The three philosophers in question are Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. I will be referring to them by their last name for simplicity. Starting with the philosophical views of each man we will see how they differ. It will be go by that each mans idea comes from a very unalike perspective on human nature. Thomas Hobbes thoughts on human nature derive from his childhood. According to Jean Hampton who wrote, She brought twins to birth, myself and fear at the homogeneous time (282) Hobbes believed that fear... ...fear. Lockes idea that everyone is born free is genuine for societies that have no established governments because even in his time there was a government. In b iblical times his idea would be office on but the transformation of peoples ideas has lead the changes in natural freedom. No one can control where they are born so they may be born in a not so free state. Finally Rousseaus idea that man is naturally good but corrupted by institutions is somewhat flawed because everyone makes choices to do or not do so people become corrupt through the choices they make in life. Through all this no one philosopher has the right answer to human nature but when we combine their ideas we get a solid way to a good solution that benefits many.Works CitedCahn, Steven M.. governmental philosophy the essential texts. 2nd ed. New York Oxford University Press, 2011. Print.