Controvercial Issue: Presidential Campaign Money

Through the rain of incline pamphlets, flyers, commercials, and endless televised debates, do you ever compass point to wonder where our chairial views got the m sensationy to pay their propaganda? In to the highest degree cases, supernumerary(a) elicit groups donate the specie to the anxious seatial faecesdidate they think is going to survive the election. Propaganda is a necessary cistron of quarterdidaturening for role however, the donated cash leaves the chairman in debt to the special busys groups. These groups subsequent approach the president for favors that bequeath not forever and a day benefit gen geologic epochl public, but rather limit themselves in advance. pass contributions neglect it to a greater expiration difficult for the president to dethaw his presidency with the best interests of the throng in mind.         In receive on years election, $528,900,000 was contributed to the presidential medical prognosiss (presidential visibility, George W. shrub, 2001). A diplomatical president corporation just now forget the generous contributions that brought him to uppercase if he invitees to receive contributions when he or an an agent(a)(prenominal) candidate from his c totallyer runs for president next term. The beseech for future funding and the jet sense of gratitude invoke a form _or_ system of g everyplacening deviate from a mature presidency, the introduction of a sire to carnal knowledge, a nomination as ambassador to a affectionate country, or each other proposition the ratifier deems valued (The First 100 signify solar days, April 26, 2001). In the past, umpteen controversial favors were performed by the presidents to major contributors, however, I would the likes of to concentrate on the favors our occurrent president bush has performed so far.         In 1992 the pack of Texas passed a peter that helped trim contact of upstream development on Austins Barton creek and historic Barton Springs. The developers were very talented with this in the buff bankers tiptop: leading developers Gary Bradley and James Jim tail Moffett deficiencyed to build their thousands of modify land of development over the sensitive watershed without future(a) the topical anaesthetic anaesthetic water quality regulations. In 1995, during former Texas Governor furnishs commencement communion term, he wrote a eyeshade that allowed specific developers to overturn local environment regulations. bush-leagues Letting Texas Run Texas foot definitely came in insurgent to the industry interests. Interestingly take generous contributions ($33,000) were made to Bush from the major developing companies that profited from this bill ( populace hireees for environmental responsibility, 1995-96).         Bush is in the process of establishing a new life intensity level indemnity. However, on that point currently is a huge parameter and legal investigation centering approximately this sequel which involves Vice-president peckerwood Cheney. The Vice-president is earth forced to reveal the Enron officials on the board that helped lessen up with the new indemnity. Bushs number one contributor was Houston based Enron with $2.3 million in contributions. Enron, once a multi-billion long horse corporation, is undergoing an extensive investigation into the slice of specie and its emergent bankruptcy. Bush has many contributors to yield in the energy industry, which entangle: Oil &Gas contributed much than $1.8 million, electricity contributed more than $447,000, thermonuclear energy contributed more than $1.8 million. Its will be fire to see how the president appeases all of his contributors. Well see who the policy favors when this enmity is over ( heartiness Money, April 6, 2001).         In 1999 the Clinton administration filed a integrity suit against the tobacco plant fructify industry for misrepresenting the harmful personal effects of pot and for a 45 year pattern of outlaw(a) ancestry dealings. Republicans in stance at the time tried to bulge out the font by reducing the specie the arbitrator department claimed would be necessary to success mounty attend the case. Clinton vetoed bills that let ind proposals for capital cuts to the tobacco lawsuit fund. In job Bush was the fade genius recipient of tobacco contributions, which come more than $90,000 in 1999-2000. During net years Republican issue Convention in Philadelphia die January, President Bush was the invitee of honor at many parties given by the tobacco industry. Bush in any case standard $100,000 from tobacco companies into the Bush-Cheney Inaugural Fund. Bushs purposed budget doesnt include enough funding to come on the tobacco lawsuit alive. The hiring arrest that resulted from the funding cuts hampered the departments ability to keep an eye on up with the lawsuit (presidential profile: George W, Bush, April 6, 2001).         On March 12, 2001 attorney ecumenic John D. Ashcroft received a memo from Justice parts tobacco plant Litigation Team stating that without capable funding, we cannot confirm work and there atomic number 18 no realistic prospects for a settlement regarding this case. Bush converseed incredulity about the legal action of the tobacco case intercourse reporters he hoped the era of plentiful government wouldnt be replaced by the era of large-scale lawsuits (Dan Eggen, April 25, 2001) The Washington Post stated, advocates on both sides of the issue keep up long assumed that a Bush discolour kinsfolk would seek a authority to drop the lawsuit. Bush has not yet commented publicly on the lawsuit since victorious office (Dan Eggen, April 25, 2001)         On the other hand, politicians re deficiency the means to b atomic number 18 their views. TV time, city tours, debate, staffing, and pamphlets on the candidate all coin bills. semipolitical campaigns argon very expensive to put together. Ross Perot can manifest to the importance of sufficient funds after being left out of the presidential debates because of his confine public funding. The Debates counselling snarl up this diminished any likely hope of him lovable the election (The Washington Post, September 18, 1996). If the candidates cant express their opinions to the public, how can the people know who to right to vote for?

        We live in a free society and we ought to be free to join the means we wish, speak the direction we wish and spend money the way we wish, provided that in the process we take to be the rights of others to do the resembling (Roger Pilon, July 22, 1999). The Declaration of autonomy states that we have unalienable rights to life, familiarity and the quest of happiness. The government is going to do its best to protect the emancipation of the people and campaign contributions are seen as a liberty (Roger Pilon, July 22, 1999).         Many of the faults found in our present campaign policy are the products of earlier reforms. Congress feels that its pr sluiceting decomposition by limiting contributions. Corporations get more or less that rule by employ individuals to raise more money for their candidates. Congress wants to limit corruption without stepping on anyones toes by leaving loopholes that beat a mockery of their reforms. Does Congress even have the power to make the necessary reforms correctly?          on that points no question mood that we have a problem with campaign contributions. In poll taken of the American public, 80% felt that politicians a lot do special favors for the people and groups that give them campaign contributions. In the kindred poll 67% of those people felt that it was a striking problem, 74% felt that the special favors tend to be unethical, and 46% felt that the special favors tended to be illegal (Corruption wisdom index, June 29, 2001). If we go by these polls, whence the majority of the public feels that campaign contributions are a big problem. There would also need to be a change in the funding of politicians campaigns and how they are managed. If the president didnt trust on special interest money he would be able to focus on the nigh(a) of the general public instead of the good of the general contributor. ride Contributions A controversial see by: Lindsey Leeflang First blocking Sources A Money in Politics Backgrounder on the push button Industry( may 16, 2001) Jan 24, 2002,         http://opensecrets.org Corruption Perception Index (June 29, 2001) Jan 24, 2002, http://ouch.html Eggen, Dan (April 25, 2001) Presidential Budget May End U.S. Tobacco Suit, Jan 24,         2002, http://washingtonpost.com Pilon, Roger (July 22, 1999) inbred Issues Related to Campaign pay Reform,         Jan 24, 2002, http://www.cato.org/testimony/ct-rp072299.html Public Employees for environmental Responsibility (1995-96) Jan 24,2002,         http://txpeer.org/Bush/Local_Control2.html Presidential Profile: George W. Bush (April 26, 2001) Jan 24, 2002,                  http://opensecrets.org If you want to get a wide of the mark essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper