Business in context

What responses do you defecate to the reading or goggle box e. G. light understandings, opinions, Insights or questions? What connections does the related additional reading or motion picture have with the unavoidable reading or video? How does It reinforce or reassessment the ideas In the required reading/evolved? This reading presents us the flack of utilitarianism, trustworthy brio cases that related to utilitarianism, three common mistakes that people usually gain ground when they applying Utilitarianism and the difficulties of measuring service.Case 1 When Ford motor company was having dilemma of modifying pintos throttle tank or keep the original design, they chose to use utilitarian approach to calculate the utility of tooth options and the result Is cost over benefit, so they chose to pretend their customers lives rather than correcting their scant(p)ly designed cars. Case 2 Lawrence summers The director of the washrag house wrote a memo that proposed shipping wastes form rich countries to little countries is a beneficial action to worlds welf are and he make 4 arguments and I think the first 3 are supported by utilitarianism. Understandings utilitarianism support that the right action is one that produces the most utility and minimizing the negatives, and the utility that reduced by the action Is non unless for the person execute the action further also for all person involved in the action. Question In the end of the reading it clearly states that health and life is beyond measuring, further Ford company and Lawrence they are putting a price on each person. Is not it would considering as an UN-ethical action? If it is not because I think we are nothing solely slaves In this world.In my opinion the additional video is not quit related to the required reading. Peter singers ethics says that every Individual has their profess interests and It Is perfectly usual that we want to spend our money on expensive reduces under our own des ires, but it will be considering as ethical action if a person spend money on contributing the would instead of acquire luxuries. And he also states that the purpose of life is making the world a better place by ones actions and presence. tantalize 2 Required interpret Reference Shaw, W. Barry, B. & Sandburs, G. (2009). Moral issues In business (1st Asia-Pacific De. ). Melbourne, Australia Coinage (Kantian ethics). Up 71-78 Lecture 2 Dilation Reading Reference California Newsreel. (2008, December 2). wellness for Sale . Retrieved from http// www. Youth. Com/watch? V=Jukeboxes Record a brief comment of what the required reading was about. What responses do you have to the reading or video e. G. Fresh understandings, opinions, insights or questions?What connections does the related additional reading or video have with the required reading or video? How does It reinforce or critique the Ideas In the required reading/evolved? Kantian ethics consequences are, and the doer must moti ve by good wills. An action might looks comparable an ethical action but if it was motive by self-interests or there concerns then this action will be considering as lack of example worth (recording to the shop assistant case) Formulate an universal natural law that applies on all our actions is what Kant wanted.And this categorical imperative rule is the measurement of ethic or UN-ethic. Understanding After reading this article I realized that everything we do has a propose, if the foundation of the propose is good will then it is ethical, but if the propose is not based on good will then it is not ethical. Question What if an action is following ones good will but in the same time it might break the universal law? This video is about UN-ethical behaviors of the world pharmaceutical market. 5% of drags were used on 11% of the people who need them and can afford them, But only 15% of drags were used on 89% of people who need them but do not have the money to buy them. And some dr ags are no longer producing because the people who need them could not afford them, the poor people are not the target of pharmaceutical market. This kind of behaviors is UN-ethical because drags were meant to assist people not only focus on making profit, companies ignore the poor is not an action of good will recording to Kantian theory.