The Teaching Styles of the Apology of Plato an the Gospel of Luke Essay

Socrates and Luke argon both(prenominal) considered to be great educators. They have both influenced count slight people with their teachings. However, comparing the two is slightly strange since Socrates is the subject of the business relationship, which is told by Plato, and Luke is the teller of the story of deliverer. A comparison can be made between the two as Socrates is a great teacher succession Plato is mostly silent and Luke, while not overly prevalent in the his story can be compargond to other accounts of the story of delivery boy among which his by far the most didactic. scarcely when you are comparing the two you essential keep in take heed that you are in actuality comparing four and also that while the story teller is supposed to only be telling you what he saw, he is also telling his personal vision of what he saw. Therefore he has a personal bias, which affects the purpose behind his style. A strong twin exists between the two storytellers Plato and Luke i n that they are both biased to a great degree. While they both teach a wonderful view they teach solely their perspective with no room for any other. Luke asserts that when Jesus died the suns light failed and the curtain of the temple was torn in two, (Luke 2344) thus giving overlord testimony that Jesus is then the son of the Almighty. Whenever Jesus is questioned the people who do so are needfully wrong, there points being made to look stupid as Jesus transcends the question with a new concept. For example, in Luke 2034-40 Jesus is asked some a wife who has been widowed and re wed several times and to who she should be married in heaven. This is a difficult question in Jewish usance where the concept of the resurrection is that of a physical rebirth and the continuation of life on earth. However, Jesus comes up with an new and controversial idea of an immortal soul. He uses the rational that since God only spoke to the living in the Torah, he only deals with the living so s ince God still represents you after death, you must still be alive after you die. This is a questionable stock at best however the obvious leaps of logic here are never examined because the questioning scribes no longer dared to ask him another question. (Luke 2040) This obviously must be because Jesus is the Son of God who speaks with divine and unquestionable authority, or so Luke seems to imply. In much the same way,... ...awesome potentiality and believability. So while martyrdom may not actually understand anything about the truth of what they say, it is very still very convincing. Overall, it is probably split up to look at the teaching styles of Socrates/Plato and Jesus/Luke as being less instructional and more as a form of propaganda. The ways ideas are presented in both the accounts seem to be meant to convince the reader of a particular viewpoint rather than enlighten him. Biased accounts in both cases use manipulative and emotional methods such as leading and unfou nded situations to influence the reader. This is not surprising since both accounts are apologies or defenses of a particular view. The goal is therefore not to educate but to take the reader to agree with the beliefs of the author. This is of course not to say that there is nix of educational value in either of these accounts. Both contain monumentally Copernican ethical principals such as wisdom comes from realizing that you are not wise, and sexual love your neighbor as yourself. However, the actual teaching style that is used by both Plato and Luke is one that has a purpose beyond the readers own education.