Pros and Cons of the Mandatory Seatbelt Law Essay -- Pro Con Essays

An enormous division currently exists between the people who swear that automobile rubber eraser should be an option and those that feel it must be a requirement. The federal government feels the morally obligated to create the safest movement environment possible. On the different end of the spectrum, opinions exist that the average driver has ability to make the choice of safety on their own. Editorials, political assemblies, debates, and conversations moderate arrived on the concept of click it or ticket. This idea refers to ticketing any force back vehicle driver and passenger that is not fastened by a seat belt. Arguments have been made for both sides, and have been reviewed in duple states. One particular article has been write, by Dr. Walter E. Williams, that discussed the negatives of click it or ticket, and has really demoralized this idea (Williams 2003). The article is properly titled Click It or Ticket, and was written in the fall of 2004. His educated opinions reflect iodin side of the polemic argument however also contain bias statistics and opinionated logic. Dr. Williams has researched the programs aspiration and actions and feels strongly against the insurance (Williams 2003). His motive of convincing readers to side with him exists in his calibre of rebellion, astonishment, and confusion. His argument lies on the basis of opinion and not practicality. On the other hand, his reasons are just and well-explained, and therefore make for a liable argument. Dr. Williams provides statistics, facts, and widely distributed observations to collectively explain his view of the click it or ticket policy (Williams 2003). The first area of Dr. Williams? argument focuses on government responsibility, rights, and laws (Williams 2003). His ge... ...ay of laws and reasonable policy. Dr. Williams is seemingly an individual of knowledge and pride, however, his education may not provide the key out his views of positive policy. Instead of viewing the governments? attempt at safety as a negative authority, he should reflect on the physical benefits sooner of the intangible conflicts. Therefore, the ?Click It or Ticket? article described one way of viewing a current law of governing safety. Dr. Williams distinctly disagrees, but an audience should generally view the attempt at safety as the proper acts of government as opposed to the negative. Safety is a necessity for a civil society, and click it or ticket laws get for a safer than nothing transportation situation. This should be appreciated and will at long last quiet all critics by accurate statistics of saved lives while maintaining a reasonable spending platform.