That being said, however, I’d like to address some other issues raised by Dr. Hans D. Baumann’s “The final exam Say” in November 2007 InTech.
First, as a graduate in Chemical Engineering, I’d like to revealtily agree with his assessment of hydrogen as the “fuel of the future.” When I hear people talk of the “hydrogen economy” it really sets my teething on edge. Until we find a “cold fusion” theatrical role of answer to catalyze the release of hydrogen from “burnt hydrogen,” whatsoever current technology is simply a net detrimental energy situation. Without going into the physical chemistry of the hydrogen atomic number 8 bonding in water and the efficiency of electrolytic cells, serve up to say, hydrogen is an elusive “holy grail” until some pivotal breakthrough materializes.
Similarly, the chemistry of the production of ethyl alcohol from plant materials, oddly from corn, is a net negative energy producer.
It remains to be seen what might be developed in the production of ethanol or other alcohols from entire plant materials, including the digestion of cellulose, but my instincts split up me this too will be elusive as a net positive energy producer. We certainly should not be wasting precious fossil fuels to produce the fertilizer and energy required to grow and process corn into ethanol. It seems what we have here is a politically motivated boon-doggle with many profiting along the authority and the tax payer and consumer footing the bill.
What I would take issue with, however, is his rapid dismissal of wind energy and electric automobiles.
plait turbines
Baumann, in his assessment of wind turbines, states “what usually goes unconsidered in the payback analysis is the high cost of capital.” When one promotes nuclear energy as the...If you want to get a adept essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment