Where I Lived , and What I Lived for hydrogen David Thoreau s Walden , tells of Thoreau s sojourn into the wilderness for two historic period (Woodlief ) He sought in the woods the rightfulness of piece s existence . He also wanted to represent self-reliantly , with the b atomic number 18st marginal nature fire offer . He recounts this in WaldenWhere I Lived , and What I Lived for is a chapter in the re directned book here(predicate) , he tells of the conjure ups he considered settling in before feeler to Walden Pond . He tells of why he considered each farm , and why he , in the end , did not depart in these farms . He did not discuss such matters as the kind of wood paneling the houses had , or the amenities operable , but the woods that surrounded it , the kinds of animals present , etcOne of the sections that captured the essence of sustenance simply is paragraph 16I went to the woods because I desireed to live advisedly , to front just the essential facts of sustenance , and see if I could not learn what it had to teach , and not , when I came to go on , discover that I had not lived . I did not wish to live what was not life , living is so serious nor did I wish to practise resignation , unless it was quite indispensable . I wanted to live deep and suck bug out all the marrow of life , to live so sturdily and Spartan-like as to put to rout all that was not life , to cut a broad swath and s cast off boney , to drive life into a corner , and reduce it to its last terms , and , if it proved to be mean , why therefore to get the whole and genuine denseness of it , and publish its meanness to the world or if it were sublime , to know it by arrest , and be able to give a true write up of it in my next excursion . For most men , it appears to me , are in a strange uncertainty about it , whether it is of the frustrate or of divinity fudge and have somewhat hastily reason that it is the chief end of man here to glorify God and enjoy him foreverThis paragraph captures essentially why Thoreau wanted to live in the woods . Here , Thoreau expresses that living simply for him is a life-and-death matter . He wanted to make for certain that he had lived , and not merely existed . This reflects the necessity for him to live in the simplest way possible : he did not impose this upon himself solely for its sake , but for a deeper reason . He chose to keep apart himself , to live closer to nature because he sought truth .
To find truth , he had to take himself out of nightclub , so he can live unhurriedly to be able to experience what nature has to offerHe wanted to have mixed bag . And change cannot be achieved through half-hearted efforts . If one is to change himself and those roughly himself , he has to strip himself of everything he once held dear , and digress over . This is what Thoreau was driving at . He wanted us to unchain ourselves from the shackles of modern living : technological conveniences that slue our attention away from the essential things in life . These devices only allot as petty pleasures (Thoreau ) that take our attention , sooner of focusing on the more important task of clear-cut for our essence , our meaning , our purpose . If we find this , it ordain serve as our guide for the rest of our lives . We will know that we have truly livedThoreau may have been dead for years now , but his observations are still applicable today . When will we listen to what this man says ? Technology may be imbedded in our lives today , and it may seem impossible to remove ourselves from applied science , but we must remember that we were born without these devices . These gadgets , results of a capitalist culture are not permanent fixtures of our body . We can live without them just like Thoreau once didReferenceWoodlief , A (n .d ) Henry David Thoreau Biography . Retrieved 30 March 2008 from http /www .vcu .edu /engweb /transcendental philosophy /authors /thoreauPAGEPAGE 3 ...If you want to get a full essay, influence it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper