Evaluate Critically The Contribution Of The Dependency Theory To The Understanding Of The Causes And Processes Of Underdevelopment

p IntroductionUnder exposement has been explained in different ways by a large number of social scientists . There are ethnical explanations that seek to understand how societal values and beliefs matter in deve coifment of societies . Sociological explanations seek to explain inventment with the structure that defines societies by way of the various classes and castes that inhabit them . anthropological explanations examine development through genetic predispositions and the racial characteristics of the inhabitants of any(prenominal) society . Historical explanations look at major accidents and events that could select shaped the destiny of any region and hence its scotch development . Some demographers have claimed that overpopulation causes underdevelopment dapple others blame but population for the same . Some blame corruption while others explain underdevelopment through human rights violationsEconomists too have tried and true to explain the differential ways in which various groups develop . The Dependency conjecture is one such(prenominal) explanation that focuses on agriculture based economies an d explains how these economies then are apply as sources of cheap raw material by the certain world that adds value to the raw material and exports finished goods back off to the same countries . This theory was expounded by Baran in 1957 where he explained how such economic drain happened in colonies that were ru conduct by the richer nations of atomic number 63 and how these poor economies were impoverished in return (Baran , 1957 ,.34Economic drainThe dependency theory was also referred to as the Economic drain theory Dadabhai Naoroji paternity in the nineteenth century in his book name UnBritish rule in India discusses how the colonial might of the British pudding stone fulfilled its goal of economic imperialism in India (Naoroji 2006 ,23- ) The export led growth theory that defined England s economic thinking in the nineteenth century put great focus on the provision of cheap imports .

This ensured that the British in all their colonies further local farmers and manu incidenturers to provide the British with cotton , coal , coloured and other supplies that would feed the large itemories in Manchester . This lead to lop sided pattern on unsustainable and dependent production that was then rudely disturbed as industrialisation happened and priorities changed . As a go forth a vulnerable population was left with no extract but acute dependence and therefore could not develop its local strengths (Frank , 1978 ,42The drain that caused dependency was further exacerbated by the fact that the vendee was operating in a monopsony and could also prescribe prices , being the sole buyer . The seller , in the absence seizure of competitive buying , was at the mercy of the ruler who govern in a buyer s market (Wolff , 1974 ,61 ) Given the fact that the colonies were also technologically backward and depended on the rulers for their technological inputs , the sellers were solely at a disadvantage . It is argued that very often the buyer would renege on prices and also cancel s at will . The farmer and the small...If you want to get a upright essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper